You will hear nostalgic old men saying: "Hizi gari za siku hizi ni karatasi."
Were the cars of the 90s actually "built like tanks," or are we just nostalgic for a time when fuel was cheaper and our knees didn't creak? Let's separate the facts from the folklore.
THE OLD SCHOOL: "The Mechanical Tank"
Older cars were built by people who didn't trust computers.
The High: Mechanically simple. No "Christmas lights" on the dashboard. If it broke down in Lokichogio, a mechanic with a spanner and a piece of wire could get you back on the road. The Toyota Corolla, Peugeot 504, and Nissan B12 were the workhorses of Kenyan roads—simple carburetors, manual transmissions, and minimal electronics.
The Low: They were loud, thirsty, and if you crashed, the car stayed "strong" while you took most of the impact. Research shows that crash tests between vintage and modern cars reveal a stark difference: older vehicles often accordion, crushing the driving compartment, while modern cars with crumple zones absorb impact energy away from passengers. Classic vehicles from 1970 and earlier carry a relative risk of fatality that's approximately 7 to 10 times higher than newer vehicles.
The Fuel Reality Check: Data shows that diesel prices in Kenya hit a record low of $0.33 per liter in 1992, which would translate to roughly KSh 25-30 per liter at the exchange rates of that era. Compare this to today's prices of approximately KSh 181 per liter, and you can see why the 90s feel like the "golden age"—not because cars were better, but because fuel was affordable.
The Verdict: They were built to survive neglect. You could put kerosene-mixed fuel, and they'd still cough and move. But "strong" didn't mean "safe."
THE MODERN MACHINE: "The Smart Ninja"
Modern cars are basically computers on wheels.
The High: They drink fuel like a proper lady sipping tea (sio wale wakunywa pombe). Fuel economy for cars improved from 21.2 mpg in 1991 to 23.9 mpg by 2015, and today's engines are even more efficient. They are silent, they have 10 airbags, crumple zones, and they tell you exactly what's wrong before it even happens. Modern vehicles benefit from advanced engineering, crash data analysis, and safety features like electronic stability control (mandatory since 2011), multiple airbags, and backup cameras (mandatory since 2018).
The Low: They have "feelings." A single dirty sensor can cause the entire car to enter Limp Mode. And let's not talk about the cost of a CVT gearbox repair. Modern cars are packed with electronic systems like infotainment, sensors, and safety features, creating more opportunities for electronic malfunctions. While mechanical components like engines and transmissions are more durable than ever, lasting well over 200,000 kilometers with proper maintenance, the complexity means expensive repairs when things go wrong.
The Verdict: They are engineered for efficiency and safety, not for "jua kali" shortcuts. A radar sensor replacement can cost more than an entire engine repair on a 90s car.
The Truth We All Avoid
Why do we think old cars were "stronger"?
Low Expectations: Back then, we tolerated noise, vibrations, and no AC. A car that started every morning was considered reliable. Today, we want the car to be a silent bedroom on wheels.
Mechanical Simplicity vs. Electronic Complexity: An old car has approximately 10-20 major systems; a new one has 1,000+ components. More electronic parts mean more potential failure points, though modern vehicles experience fewer total mechanical failures. The difference? When a 90s car's alternator failed, you knew immediately. When a modern car's throttle position sensor acts up, you get cryptic error codes and a trip to the dealer.
Survival Bias: The Peugeot 504s and Toyota Corollas we remember fondly are the ones that survived. We've forgotten the countless cars that rusted to death, overheated constantly, or had carburetors that needed constant adjustment.
The Reliability Paradox: Modern cars require far less maintenance, with service intervals stretched to 15,000-30,000 km compared to the multiple annual visits needed in the 1990s. Yet we perceive them as less reliable because electronic failures feel more frustrating than mechanical ones—a dashboard warning or frozen screen seems worse than a tangible noise or leak.
The Safety Reality: Numbers Don't Lie
The Crash Test Truth: When tested in modern crash conditions, vehicles from the 1990s-2000 era were focused more on luxury than safety, while today's cars use hot-stamped steel with 1,500 megapascals of strength compared to 500 megapascals in older vehicles. Recent tests comparing a late-1980s VW Golf II with a current Golf VIII in a 64 km/h offset frontal crash showed the old model folded like a tin can.
Airbags: It wasn't until September 1998 that the US government required all cars to have front airbags. Most 90s cars in Kenya had zero airbags. Today's vehicles have 6-10 airbags as standard.
Structural Engineering: Modern cars use crumple zones and reinforced passenger compartments. The crumple zones absorb kinetic energy during collisions, reducing impact on passengers. Old cars were rigid—which sounds strong until you realize that rigidity transfers all the crash energy directly to your body.
The Fuel Efficiency Myth
The Numbers: For light trucks (pickups, vans, SUVs), fuel economy was 17 mpg in 1991 and only improved to 17.3 mpg by 2015. Why the slow progress? During the 1990s, light-duty trucks grew from 10% to 45% of market share, and combined fleet-wide fuel efficiency actually dropped about one mile per gallon from 1990 to 2000.
Modern cars ARE more fuel-efficient, but they're also heavier (due to safety equipment) and more powerful. Today's cars have more than twice the horsepower of 90s vehicles, plus airbags, high-tensile steel, AC, sound deadening, and larger wheels—all adding weight.
The Maintenance Reality
Old Cars: Required constant attention. Oil changes every 3,000-5,000 km, valve adjustments, carburetor cleaning, points replacement, rust treatment. But when something broke, a roadside mechanic could often fix it with basic tools.
Modern Cars: Service intervals of 15,000-30,000 km are now standard, and engines can easily exceed 300,000 km with proper care. However, repairs require diagnostic computers, specialized tools, and often, genuine parts that must be ordered. The complexity means that while overall reliability has improved, electronic issues have become more common.
Final Word
Old cars were Tough. Modern cars are Smart. Neither is objectively "better"—it all depends on your priorities and Maintenance Discipline.
The Hard Truth: A neglected Peugeot 504 will die just as fast as a neglected Mazda Demio. The difference is that the Peugeot will warn you with noise, smoke, and vibrations. The Demio will just flash a cryptic error code and refuse to start.
The Nostalgia Factor: We remember when fuel was KSh 30 per liter, roads were less congested, and owning any car felt like an achievement. That's not about the cars—that's about Kenya in the 90s versus Kenya today.
Where Do You Stand?
TEAM VINTAGE: "Give me a manual 90s Toyota any day! I can fix it myself, it'll survive anything, and no check engine light nonsense!"
TEAM MODERN: "I love my sensors, comfort, and 20km/L! Plus, I'd rather survive a crash than have my car survive it without me."
TEAM LEGSUS/KNEESAN/FOOTSUBISHI: "At this rate, the only reliable car is my own two legs! These fuel prices are killing everyone equally—vintage and modern alike!"
The Bottom Line
Modern cars are objectively safer, more fuel-efficient, and more reliable in terms of mechanical failures. But they're complex, expensive to repair, and require specialized knowledge.
Old cars were simple, repairable, and could tolerate abuse—but they were death traps in crashes, terrible for the environment, and required constant maintenance.
The "best" car depends on your circumstances:
- If you're handy and budget-conscious: A well-maintained 90s/early 2000s Toyota or Nissan still makes sense
- If you value safety and efficiency: Modern cars are the clear winner
- If you're in rural areas far from dealers: Mechanical simplicity still has advantages
The real question isn't which era was better—it's whether we're maintaining our vehicles properly, driving safely, and being honest about what we can afford in today's economy.
What do you think? Drop your take in the comments. Are you Team Vintage, Team Modern, or firmly on Team Legsus?
Comments
Post a Comment